Showing posts with label Newsweek. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Newsweek. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 4, 2007

It's coming, "lizabeth.....

Well, tomorrow's the big day. Fred IS on Leno. Lemme guess.....

Newsweek's profile is a good read for background. Find it here: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20546334/site/newsweek/

My very quick thoughts.

I'd be hard-pressed to snuggle the Butter Princess. And I like butter. (Land-o-Lakes. Salted, thank you.) Look, it's a lot to schmooze. I'm not comfortable with it, and apparently Fred's not either. I want him to be a president. And I bet the Butter Princess would agree.

Fred's lazy. Yawn. He's NOT lazy, dammit! He's not as insanely egocentric as the rest of the people in the pool. From Newsweek, "But in his long, meandering career—as a young Tennessee prosecutor who won 14 of 15 bank-robbery cases, a twice-elected senator and Washington lobbyist and an accidental actor who stars in one of the most popular shows on television—Thompson has never lost a job, or a campaign, because of a lack of effort. "If I had to pick one thing that qualifies him to be president," says (Howard) Baker, "it's this: he approaches things calmly, deliberately—and he doesn't shoot from the hip." Yup. I hate those qualifications. Get it? Because he did this, he's lazy. Hard work equals lazy. I'm soooooo confused.

I never had a friend named Chunky Moore, but I wish I did. How cool is that? Chunky.

A man that insists on marrying his pregnant girlfriend at age 17 is... a man. It shows character and responsibility. I wish there was more of this,especially when I see some entertainers touting responsibility, but ignoring their offspring. Good for Fred, and good for Sarah's parents for relenting. And even in divorce, they're adults.

Fred built pews. A man that works with his hands, usually develops a good mind. It's patience, and attention to detail. And a oneness with something more important. I believe we call that faith, or God.

Fred graduates near the top of his class. With a scholarship. From law school As a father. Who worked odd jobs to support his family. (Here's the tipping point for politicos. Most people would appreciate the sacrifice. Partisan Democrats would never admire this. They're not sure why, but they know to appreciate this would empower Fred, and hence a Republican, and that would be...bad.)

As a Republican, Fred worked for the Republicans, when asked. Egads!.

Fred asked the question that everyone knew. "Were there recording devices..." He had the forum, and asked it. If he didn't, he'd be a partisan hack. That escapes the opposition, who want to vilify him for no other reason that he's a Republican.

Fred served in private practice, and then as a lobbyist. Sometimes lobbyist represent people with whom fifty percent of the population disagree. That's why people hire lobbyists; that is, to convince the other half of the population of the meritorious nature of their argument. It may work, it may not. Aristede? Probably not so much. Insurance and asbestos? Maybe.

More lobbying. Yawn. Fred's elected. Fred smokes a cigar from Bill Clinton.

Fred gets campaign finance abuse reform. Fred gets to look at Bill. Fred says Dems and Repubs are equally not so good on financing. Republicans (well not really, it was Trent Lott) get steamed. Fred earns the enmity of the powerful. (Well not really, it was Trent Lott.)

Fred's daughter dies prematurely. Fred is tired, and mortal, and doesn't run for re-election. This indicates to the liberal press, that Fred is a slacker. Obviously, Fred uses this to political advantage, and decides not to run, because he's an opportunistic Republican. You know, just like when he respected family and got married at seventeen. Because a lifetime of commitment to family can be so harmful to the national image, and it shows a lack of diversity, or something.

Acting takes hold. Release for the Fred psyche? I hope so.

Fred's image is solidified by portraying the hard hitting DA Arthur Branch in "Law and Order." It's not a stretch. He's been an Assistant US Attorney. Close, but not the same. However, he exudes authority as the NYDA. Television audience? They love it. (Caveat....been there, done that; got the t-shirt...and still wear 'em with pride! Actually, it's DANY. And for all the naysayers, Law and Order is spot on. He is the persona of a DA, and a DA that the average Joe expects from a DA. Ya got an issue? Post a comment.)

Fred marries a younger woman. Jealous libs cry foul. People attack the wife, saying she can't have a normal thought because she is attractive. This passes as discourse.

Fred may be a cool President because he's acted as one before, but if we're smart, we won't elect him.

End of article.

Conclusion?

Reagan was an actor, and Bush pretends to be President, so this is what's next. Fred's an actor who'll do us harm. "it's much harder to play commander when you don't have a script." Get it? It's all a game. It's acting. Fred could never compete with the other candidates. Athlete, family man, prosecutor, senator, lobbyist, father. He can't hold a candle to those normal people. You know, those normal people. Those everyday Joe's... Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards, etc. They understand. They've been there. Really? Show it to me.

Is there a one among them that's lived the life of Fred?

You know the answer.

Fred enters tomorrow. Let's pay attention from here on out.

Thanks for the ear.

Saturday, June 23, 2007

Stay true to your school.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19263100/site/newsweek/

Newsweek is out with commentary on Fred. As Glenn Reynold's says, read the whole thing.

I'll add my two cents on the main bits.

Georgette Mosbacher, and Fred the bachelor.

I'd lament missing a trip with Georgette Mosbacher, too. She's smart, savvy, connected, and wealthy. Europe with her. Ten out of ten. Newsweek's point?

Cigars and Clinton

The cigar reference is, to me, an equivocal statement, and can be read to be either supportive of Clinton and a gentle ribbing, or needling of Clinton and a gentle ribbing. I understand that not every conversation or attitude needs to be vitriolic. Attorneys do it all the time. One can have an acerbic presence in the courtroom, and still remain congenial in the hallway and in correspondence.

Fred's archives at the University of Tennessee

I'm glad Fred's records and correspondence are open for review. Today's candidates run from their history. I don't know, and I bet neither does Newsweek, if Fred believed that, "he had forever traded Washington for Hollywood when he agreed to put his eight years of Senate records, including personal correspondence, in a public archive at the University of Tennessee."

Of course, the implication is that this was somehow a tactical error, since any smart candidate would have withheld the records from public review. (Get it? It's smarter, and more politically savvy to hide your personal record from the people who have the most interest in reading them. We wouldn't want any of those pesky constituents learning the truth and making informed decisions.) I'm not so sure The Fourth Estate wishes to endorse secrecy, but by inference, they sure seem to.

Abortion

I don't see inconsistency in Fred's prior statements. See his most recent statement, below. (Straight Shooter http://fredthompsonscourt.blogspot.com/2007/06/straight-shooter.html)
Formerly, he has endorsed the rule of law, while disagreeing with the rationale. Upholding the law while not agreeing with it is not inconsistent, it's a belief in the system and the rule of law. I think not calling for anarchy is a good thing. I've always felt the logic of Roe v. Wade was squishy, and even more so today with advances in neonatal care. (Really, explain the nuance of trimester calculation and the medical intervention based upon that, and we can have a discussion or three.) I'm not sure who Fred's "opponents" are on this issue. Is it the Right to Lifers? The Pro-Choicers? Fred states he disagrees with abortion, upholds the law and seeks a political and legal solution to the issue. Is there a there, there?

McCain-Feingold

Fred led the investigation into campaign fund-raising abuses. As a former prosecutor, he did what a good former prosecutor should do, and that is, follow the evidence. So he does, and sees some untoward things by Democrats AND Republicans, and has the audacity to pursue it, and earns the enmity of his party machine, and gets bitten by the ego of Trent Lott. And now after seeing the results of this reform, Fred thinks there could be some tweaking. The result? He's being criticized by both sides of the aisle for his change of mind. I guess Congress just hates new learning curves. Once you get the money and power thing down, any change to that machine just cuts into the bottom line.

Stay true to your school, Fred, you're doing just fine.